Application process ****************************************************************************************** * ****************************************************************************************** Description of verification and evaluation criteria Each candidate must complete the admission procedure. The entrance exam takes place in fro committee in the form of an oral interview and examines the student's ability to do scient field. The Commission shall evaluate according to the following criteria: 1. Quality of the dissertation project and its elaboration – the applicant must submit the in writing with the following recommended structure: • introduction, literature review, research question, objective, hypotheses according to t thematic focus of the project determination, methodology, expected outputs with the intr their practical point of view into the researched issues, financing, and possible domest collaboration The Commission evaluates the topic's novelty, the logical processing of the project annota overall overview of the selected topic. The maximum number of points for the item is 25 points. 2. The relationship of the topic to the supervisor's focus, his research activities, and o including the overall consistency with the professional focus of the workplace/department faculty. • there must be apparent compliance of the proposed topic with the research focus of the t the workplace, a clear link to the activities of previously solved and ongoing projects relevant and recognizable indicators of research activity The future integration of the doctoral student into the supervisor and the workplace's ong expected optimally, including the solved financing of research activities. The maximum number of points for the item is 20 points. The applicant can find the information on supervisors at http://www.ftvs.cuni.cz/FTVS-177. "http://www.ftvs.cuni.cz/FTVS-177.html"] . 3. Previous professional activity in the field of Kinanthropology - evaluates previous act to the project, preferably publishing papers and speech at the scientific conference (arti points, in the Scopus database - 12 points, in a peer-reviewed scientific journal - 6 poin presentation at a scientific conference - 4 points). Magazine articles must only take the form of "original paper/study, letter, review." The full number of points will be awarded to the candidate if they are the first author; t author receives 75% points for the relevant item; the third co-author receives 50%; the fo co-author gets 25%. Items can be cumulated. The maximum number of points for the item is 20 points. 4. The method of project presentation and the applicant's ability to respond and questions The maximum number of points for the item is 15 points. 5. Level of presentation and communication skills in English. During the interview, the candidate is asked to conduct a part of the project proposal or commission members in the English language. The candidate's ability to present and discuss topics in English is assessed. The maximum number of points for the item is 20 points. Each member of the Commission evaluates paragraph 1 in the range of 0-25, paragraph 2 in t points, paragraph 3 in the range of 0-20 points, paragraph 4 in the range of 0-15 points, in the range of 0-20 points. The maximum possible number of points from one assessor is, t The arithmetic average is calculated from the point evaluation of individual members of th Rounding will be to integers - for scores of 0.0-0.49 down to the nearest integer, and for 0.50-0.99 upwards, to the nearest whole number. The final number of points determines the candidates. The minimum threshold for admission is 50 points. Conditions for admission Admission to Doctoral studies is conditioned by successful completion of a Master's study Verification method: entrance exam • Request for recognition of foreign university education and qualification [ URL "FTVSEN- request_for_recognition_of_for.docx"] • Recognition of Foreign Diplomas and Degrees [ URL "http://www.cuni.cz/UKEN-16.html"]